So we essentially use LiftActors for ContinuationActors but still keep Scala Actors for CometActors. I'm more comfortable with this approach not from technical reasoning but from adoption/political.
Br's, Marius On May 26, 9:09 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > I've just committed a change to Lift that uses LiftActors for Lift's > "ContinuationActors". This is the class that's used to bridge between comet > requests and any CometActors. They are short lived, internal to Lift and > have been the subject of the most memory retention issues. This change > should be invisible to your applications, other than being another line of > defense against the memory retention issues. If the EPFL folks and the Lift > folks can unify the API and support needs for Actors, I'll quietly revert > the class to using Scala's Actor class. > > Thanks, > > David > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some:http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
