Hi Marius,

I just updated to the tip and got a build failure:

[WARNING] /home/bryan/public-repos/git/liftweb/sites/example/src/main/
scala/net/liftweb/example/snippet/Ajax.scala:65: error: value
autocomplete is not a member of object net.liftweb.http.jquery.JqSHtml
[WARNING]          "auto" -> JqSHtml.autocomplete("", buildQuery _, _
=> ()))

--Bryan

On Jun 15, 2:16 pm, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I just made the autocomplete a Lift widget so it does not exist
> anymore in JqShtml object. Here is an example on how to use it:
>
> - For Ajax autocomplete
>     AutoComplete("", (current, limit) => {
>       println("current = " + current)
>       (1 to limit).map(v => "Value_" + v)
>     }, s => println("submit " + s))
>
> - For pre-provided options list
>    AutoComplete.autocompleteObj(/*same params as bfore*/)
>
> This may break your app but I think it is very easy to update it.
>
> I also fixed some bugs:
> 1. It didn;t work if the container cookies were turned off
> 2. hovering on the options list did not work on Ubuntu FF3 at least
> due to a capitalizated LI equality test.
>
> If you encounter any problems, please let me know.
>
> Br's,
> Marius
>
> On Jun 8, 12:34 pm, Kevin Wright <kev.lee.wri...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
>
> > As an evolving framework, it definitely makes more sense to favour
> > consistency over backward compatibility at this stage
>
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:00 AM, marius d. <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Other folks, please speak up ! :) ... I will soon migrate this into a
> > > Lift widget.
>
> > > Br's,
> > > Marius
>
> > > On Jun 6, 4:53 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I think I'm using in one place in one project so my api breakage factor
> > > is
> > > > low.  I'm okay with moving it unless someone else is going to feel real
> > > > pain.
>
> > > > On Jun 6, 2009 12:24 AM, "Marius" <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Is there a reason why the JQuery autocomplete is not a Lift widget but
> > > > instead it lives in http/jquery package? .. I remember a long time ago
> > > > me putting it in the jquery package to separate SHtml stuff that is
> > > > dependent on JQuery to the others.
>
> > > > Thoughts?
>
> > > > Br',
> > > > Marius
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to