Mapper will be maintained for quite a while after Record comes out, and the two (at present) have similar architectures. JPA is certainly an option, but don't toss Mapper out as an option simply because Record will be in place in the near future.
Derek On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:41 AM, czerwonka <andy.czerwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It'd be nice not to have to port. I'd hat to have to port my mapper > code as soon after I write it. Maybe JPA is the answer then. > > On Jul 10, 7:24 am, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mapper as Record is not yet complete. > > > > Br's, > > Marius > > > > On Jul 10, 4:21 pm, czerwonka <andy.czerwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > If I'm starting today, should I use Mapper or Record? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
