All jars are in the ./lib dir. Running the kernel from ./bin dir works
out of the box. Put apps in the ./deploy dir.
If you want I build it using maven you have install some missing libs
that are not in any public maven repo (and all these jars are in
lib). .
Easiest way is simply to download the distro from the downloads
section.
Hope it helps.
/Jonas
On Jul 13, 12:43 pm, Viktor Klang <viktor.kl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, installing AKKA requires currently some hand-waving to add
> dependencies that are not resolved:
>
> com.facebook.fb303-1.0.jar
> org.apache.cassandra:cassandra:jar:0.4.0-dev
>
> Or is my Maven just b0rked?
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Viktor Klang <viktor.kl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Instead of:
>
> > class MyActor extends Actor {
> > makeTransactionRequired …
>
> > }
>
> > woudn't it be clean to have:
>
> > trait TxRequired
> > {
> > self : TransactionManagement =>
>
> > makeTransactionRequired
> > }
>
> > class MyActor extends Actor with TxRequired
>
> > {
>
> > }
>
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Jonas Bonér <jbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hi.
>
> >> On Jul 13, 9:51 am, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
> >> > From what I can see, its not just about concurrency, right? STM is
> >> probally
> >> > used in conjunction with Cassandra...?
>
> >> Right. Even though messages in the actor model are immutable the
> >> actors are not. If they were they would be almost useless.
>
> >> The actor model is great for some use cases but terrible for others. I
> >> have many times felt like I would like to have a transactional
> >> compositional message flows. This is an attempt to solve that problem
> >> (and some other problems as well).
>
> >> The STM is working with managed data structures like TransactionalMap/
> >> Vector/Ref. Accessing them outside a tx yields an error. The STM also
> >> understand and works with asynchronous messaging something that is not
> >> trivial.
>
> >> I think there is some synergy between both Lift and Goat Rodeo. Would
> >> love to see what could come out of that. I am open for all suggestions/
> >> crazy ideas.
>
> >> Thank, Jonas.
> >> > Cheers, Tim
>
> >> > On 13/07/2009 07:25, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > I wonder why STM in a message passing concurrency model where things
> >> > > supposed to be immutable.
>
> > --
> > Viktor Klang
>
> > Java Specialist
> > Scala Loudmouth
> > Lift Committer
>
> --
> Viktor Klang
>
> Java Specialist
> Scala Loudmouth
> Lift Committer
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
