Thank you for the answer. I will modify locally the classes in order to go on with the implementation and to find other critical point. Keeping persistence backend inside net.liftweb.record, probably it will be sufficient to relax to private[record] the var fieldList.
Regards Giuseppe On 14 Lug, 13:57, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:32 PM, marius d. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Currently in MetaRecords there is only a fieldByName function that > > returns the field from a Record based on its name but it probably > > won't help you much. The internal fieldList is currently private but > > probably we should relax this to protected? > > +1 > > > > > Br's, > > Marius > > > On Jul 14, 1:15 pm, Giuseppe Fogliazza <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am trying to implement a backend for Record in order to persist them > > > in a directory structure as XML files. > > > I started writing down an XMLMetaRecord (extending MetaRecord) with > > > the basic method save and delete. > > > How can I access the list of field defined for a Record? > > > Thanks! > > -- > Viktor Klang > > Java Specialist > Scala Loudmouth > Lift Committer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
