more info here:http://www.scala-lang.org/node/199
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]>wrote: > > Robin, > > Whilst your questions are valid and there are a lot of very very good > Scala folk on the lift mailing list, you'll probably get broader Scala > audience over at the main Scala mailing list hosted by EPFL. > > Cheers, Tim > > > On Jul 20, 8:49 pm, robin bakkerus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because Scala currently is not mainstream (yet), I think changes are > > very small that Scala will used soon in of our projects. > > However we do have a large app that relies very heavily on very many, > > complex and time consuming xml/xslt transformation. > > I can image that Scala being a functional language as well, may be the > > perfect alternative to replace this app. > > From what from the Scala documentation so far, is that it could have > > the following advantages over xslt: > > - much much faster, because it is compiled > > - more productive, with the help of the IDE debugger etc > > - more maintainable, due to the OO nature when making reusable > > functions etc. > > > > My questions is: > > - Are the above statements correct. > > - Are the demo programs demonstrating the xslt functionality > > - What performance boost (if any) are realistic > > > > thank in advance > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
