If it's a left-to-right sawtooth (e.g. increasing linearly over time  
and then sharply dropping) then that's probably garbage accumulating  
then the GC running.

-Ross

On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Peter Robinett wrote:

>
> Nope, haven't touched any of the files. As for the increases, they do
> not appear to, since requests happen approximately every second and
> the length of each spike is around one minute.
>
> Peter
>
> On Jul 28, 3:16 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It would redeploy if you were using mvn jetty:run and you changed  
>> files in the webapp.
>> Do the increases correspond to (specific) requests?
>>
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> Peter Robinett<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Naftoli. After running for an hour the app is using 45-60% of
>> my (very little) memory. It appears that memory is being used in a
>> sawtooth pattern, with the baseline gradually creeping upwards.[1] I
>> don't see any mention in the logs of any redeployments.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> [1]:http://www.bubblefoundry.com/lift/jconsole-overview.jpg
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2:15 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You can monitor it with jconsole.
>>> Is the memory building up gradually and not being garbage  
>>> collected? Is it being redeployed without restarting jetty?
>>
>>> -------------------------------------
>>
>>> Peter Robinett<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks all for the comments and suggestions. I'm totally new to the
>>> Java world, so thanks for mentioning all these various options.
>>
>>> First, my system: MySQL is the database I'm using with my Lift app
>>> (and some other very low traffic apps) and is tuned pretty
>>> aggressively to use little memory. It seems to only use tens of
>>> megabytes. My Lift app is based upon 1.1-SNAPSHOT and archetype  
>>> lift-
>>> archetype-basic.
>>
>>> Second, JVM options and analysis: how should I pass options to the  
>>> JVM
>>> when launching jetty and Lift with 'mvn jetty:run'? What heap size
>>> should I use? How do I monitor a JVM process? My actors being  
>>> notified
>>> of the REST POSTs are scala.actors, as I understood them to be
>>> sufficient[1]: class NodeActor extends Actor with ListenerManager.  
>>> The
>>> CometActors that listen to the NodeActors are defined like: class
>>> NodeGraph extends CometActor.
>>
>>> Thanks for your help,
>>> Peter
>>
>>> [1]:http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/msg/86d518b0c44b1b58? 
>>> hl=en
>>
>>> On Jul 28, 10:31 am, Spencer Uresk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm not sure about how much overhead Jetty adds to the mix (I'd  
>>>> assume it
>>>> would be small, but I could be wrong), but on my production  
>>>> server, a small
>>>> Lift app added only 30 - 40 mb or so to the memory usage of my  
>>>> Tomcat
>>>> instance. Based on my experience with running Java and Groovy based
>>>> applications on a VPS, a 256 mb slice should be plenty unless you  
>>>> have lots
>>>> of concurrent sessions and/or big sessions. If people are having  
>>>> a different
>>>> experience with Lift-based apps, I'd be interested in hearing  
>>>> that (and
>>>> why).
>>
>>>> Peter, Have you tried running jmap on your box to generate a heap  
>>>> dump and
>>>> then analyzing that to see what is using up all the memory? Using  
>>>> something
>>>> like MAT (www.eclipse.org/mat/) makes it pretty easy to see what  
>>>> the likely
>>>> culprits are, and then you can go from there.
>>
>>>> - Spencer
>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Timothy Perrett  
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>>> Agreed; its pretty light to run all those services. I have a  
>>>>> lift based app
>>>>> that's been running for quite some time and its using around  
>>>>> 250mb of RAM
>>>>> on
>>>>> average. A raw lift app will probably use 128mb RAM as minimum.
>>
>>>>> Cheers, Tim
>>
>>>>> On 28/07/2009 10:08, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> BTW 256mb seems to me ridiculous small for a server side  
>>>>>> application.
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to