Thank you for the interest and the kind offering to adapt the framework. I will post my request. At the moment the major extension that I would require to Record is a neat management of MultiField[T]. I need them in my domain model and they will be persisted as multi valued properties (or multiple child nodes) of a node. I am looking at the recent extension to Mapper for inspiration.
Regards Giuseppe On 29 Lug, 10:06, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 29, 10:44 am, Giuseppe Fogliazza <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In my comprehension of the overall framework, Mapper provides > > persistence together with form management for ui construction and some > > serialization method to support the development of REST services. > > In the design of Record, persistency has been stripped away in order > > to create the condition to plug different backend (despite the many > > DBxxxx polluting the package). > > Correct. > > > in Mapper Schemifier provide > > initialization service for a persistence layer and hence in the new > > architecture it should be provided by the specific backend (if > > required). > > Correct. > > > I am writing a JCR persistence layer and at the moment (addressing > > jsr-170) I have no need of a Schemifier. In the next version addresing > > jsr-283 and a proper management of Node types, inside the equivalent > > of Schemifier I will put the verification if the current repository > > has the right node types, corresponding to the MetaRecord (extended > > with JCRNodeType) objects defined by the domain model. > > That would be very interesting. If you do a Record refinement for jsr > 170/283 would be really neat. If you run into some things and feel > that you need more flexibility from the Record framework, please let > us know and we'll discuss what the most sensible way of doing it. > > > > > On 29 Lug, 08:40, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Nope. Record currently has nothing to do with RDBMS. It is a higher > > > level of model abstraction that allows various implementations. RDBMS > > > will likely be implemented but likely other models as well such > > > Cassandra and ZooKeeper thru Dave's GoatRodeo. > > > > Br's, > > > Marius > > > > On Jul 29, 9:16 am, Heiko Seeberger <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there something like Schemifier for lift-record? > > > > > Heiko > > > > > -- > > > > > My blog: heikoseeberger.name > > > > Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger > > > > OSGi on Scala:www.scalamodules.org > > > > Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
