Giuseppe,
Im sure you already know this, but be carfull when comparing mapper to record... There implementations (whilst similar) are semantically different... Certainly that's been my experience whilst implementing a custom backend for Record (blog post coming soon) Cheers, Tim On 17/08/2009 15:44, "Giuseppe Fogliazza" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I confirm that there are some efforts in progress. Particularly I am > writing a jsr 170 (jackrabbit) backend for Record. It is taking longer > than expected because I am extending Record with reference field and > multivalued field that are of paramount relevance in domain modeling. > I studied recent extension to Mapper (TableEditor, OneToMany, > ManyToMany) as a starting point. > > Regards > Giuseppe > > On 16 Ago, 12:00, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Short answer: "no". >> >> Long answer: There are a couple of efforts in progress, but this are >> early, early stages (not even runnable code). >> >> Cheers, Tim >> >> On Aug 16, 7:08 am, philip <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> Has anyone made a CMS for Liftweb? or I should say, in liftweb. >> >>> Thanks, Philip > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
