On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:31 AM, marius d. <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Greg/Viktor, > > We could meet and discuss using whatever means (skype, chat, mail > etc.) and brainstorm what can we do about this. Even though I like a > lot sticky sessions idiom it is not enough and I think we do have a > consensus here :) ... of course any committer is more then welcome to > participate. On the substance point (I've moved this to the Lift list), we may want to use some aspecty thing to analyze the potential serializability of functions that are added to the LiftSession. I'm betting there's no actual barrier to serializing stuff in the normal case except when things refer to the HttpServletRequest (which refers to input/output streams). If we could get an actual analysis, we could develop a better serialization/session moving strategy. > > > Br's, > Marius > > On Aug 22, 12:15 am, Viktor Klang wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Meredith Gregory > > > > > wrote: > > > Marius, > > > i really do want to go over lift's ability to > > > work in vendor supplied clustering solutions. > > > > We could do a Skype conf when you're feeling better, Greg. > > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
