On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:48 AM, inca <incarn...@whiteants.net> wrote:
> > Ok, thanks. Another question then. As far as I can see from sources, > basic KeyedRecord trait depends on some Mapper classes. Does Record > use Mapper for JDBC operations under the covers? Yes. > > > On 27 авг, 01:25, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote: > > Its not the primary ORM at the moment. Although, its developing, and its > > still simply awesome if you are not using JDBC storage. > > > > If you just need regular JDBC style connectivity, then use Mapper for > now. > > > > Cheers, Tim > > > > On 26/08/2009 19:01, "inca" <incarn...@whiteants.net> wrote: > > > > > Is there any documentation available for Lift Record Framework? From > > > liftbook: "The Record framework is relatively new to Lift. The plan is > > > to move to Record as the primary ORM framework for Lift sometime after > > > version 1.0". Is it the "primary ORM" now? > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
