> > Also, the LiftRules.parseDate function currently does DateTime > > parsing, so I would have to make a breaking change to rename it to > > parseDateTime and add new parseDate and parseTime (and associated > > format methods). Thoughts? > > I think this is the right solution. Don't know how much will break > because of this though. But hey, if we're breaking things anyway, why > not put in Joda time (or maybe > scala-timehttp://github.com/jorgeortiz85/scala-time/tree/master;-)
Although not belonging to breaking changers camp, breaking changes are great when it's for a cause. IMHO, scala time is a darn good cause and worth the break! Cheers, Indrajit > > /Jeppe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
