On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim <[email protected]>wrote:
> > What's exactly the problem if it's pre 1.0? That it may have bugs? > It may have bugs. The APIs may change. Jorge (now that he has a day job) may not continue to maintain it. In general, unless there's a compelling reason, we're not going to put >= 1.0 Lift on < 1.0 packages. > > ------------------------------------- > Derek Chen-Becker<[email protected]> wrote: > > Right. Fortunately most of the work setting up Joda Time will make > switching > to Scala Time pretty simple. > > Derek > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Timothy Perrett <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > I thought we had this discussion in some other thread and because > > scala-time wasn't 1.0 there was a general reluctancy to use it? We > > could cherry pick some of the code however; im sure Jorge wouldn't > > mind :-) > > > > Cheers, Tim > > > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 11:30, Charles F. Munat wrote: > > > > > > > > You have looked at Scala Time, right? I think some of this may already > > > be implemented there, and it would probably be better to extend that > > > rather than reinvent it. But maybe I'm thinking about something else? > > > > > > http://github.com/jorgeortiz85/scala-time > > > > > > Chas. > > > > > > Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > > >> Oh, I plan on incorporating the DSL. My thought was that JodaHelpers > > >> would define most of the same methods as TimeHelpers, just > > >> operating on > > >> DateTime instead of Date and Calendar. Then you could do > > >> > > >> import ...Helpers._ > > >> import ...JodaHelpers._ > > >> > > >> and the latter import would mask the TimeHelpers methods. Or you > > >> could > > >> just import JodaHelpers by itself. Actually, Joda Time has some very > > >> nice facilities for doing intervals that would simplify the DSLs a > > >> lot > > >> and possibly make it richer. > > >> > > >> Derek > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:19 PM, David Pollak > > >> <[email protected] > > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> I personally like the DSLs that TimeHelpers provides. I'd hate to > > >> see it deprecated or go away without the ability to write 30 > > >> seconds > > >> later using some other DSL. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Derek Chen-Becker > > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> > > >> Well, actually, maybe I'll just make a JodaHelpers with the > > >> applicable methods on it and we can just deprecate the entire > > >> TimeHelpers object. If anyone else has a better idea I'm all > > >> ears. > > >> > > >> Derek > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Derek Chen-Becker > > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> > > >> OK, will do. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:18 PM, David Pollak > > >> <[email protected] > > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> > > >> I'd prefer not the break the apis without deprecating > > >> them first > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Derek Chen-Becker > > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Just asking, since I'm looking at bolting a lot of > > >> java.util.Date methods onto the innards of > > >> TimeHelpers so that the specs pass. > > >> > > >> Derek > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Lift, the simply functional web framework > > http://liftweb.net > > >> Beginning Scala > > http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > > >> Surf the harmonics > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > > >> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > > >> Surf the harmonics > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
