On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I feel that having classes with names like S wastes my very limited
> brain ram while reading or writing lift applications. Why not to use
> more describing but longer names? Not wasting bytes on these difficult
> economic times? This might be unfair rant as I didn't find any others,
> but this damn S keeps popping up a lot :D
>
S == Stateful
Back when I started doing Lift, there were no IDEs, no code completion, and
access to the stateful parts of Lift was common, so I called this S.
If you don't like it:
import net.liftweb.http.{S => SomethingLongerThanS}
>
> ps. Great framework!
>
> - Vesa
> >
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
