On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Guys, > > I've noticed that the lift-wizard hasn't had any commits for ages - > where is this too in terms of usability etc? > I'm presenting it at Bay Area Scala Enthusiasts on Monday... although I've written almost no new code... but I have a killer design in my head. Expect something working and marginally usable on Monday night (just before I leave for LinkedIn). Basically, I'm separating the field logic/flow logic from any UI. This will allow for automated testing of the wizards without a front end (and if you trust the wizard state <-> UI translation, then there's no need to test the stuff in a browser). > > I was looking at the implementation and was wondering if wizard > serialisation had been considered? Interesting feature. It brings up the whole serialization issue. Marius and I were chatting about that on Friday. Maybe it'll be my mission post M8 to get serialization nailed. > I would use the wizard code as soon > as it was available and serialisation would be a really important > feature for us - that is, the ability to serialise a wizard process, > persist it, and reload it on-demand at a later date... its highly > likely that we would have several wizard type processes to load > dynamically from disk / datastore etc. > > Cheers, Tim > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
