On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:42 PM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Kris Nuttycombe > <kris.nuttyco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Derek Chen-Becker >> <dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Looks like it. Probably private[liftweb] would work, too. In any case, >> > the >> > scaladocs need to be updated to reflect what it's for. >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Kris Nuttycombe >> > <kris.nuttyco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hmmm.... is this now TransientRequestVar? It's private[http], but >> >> could it be protected instead? >> >> >> >> Kris >> >> David, do you have an opinion? Is there any reason to keep this >> private to lift, or is it something that 3rd-party libraries could >> make use of (as in this case?) > > I wanted to keep it as narrow as possible while we saw how it worked and got > better naming. Making it private[liftweb] is fine and we'll open it up > later. >
Okay, done and on ReviewBoard. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
