On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 06:21:09AM +0000, Ismael Juma wrote: > I was looking at the fix[1] and it doesn't seem to me like it's the > correct fix (although it does fix the infinite loop). If I call > ensureCapacity and the internal array length is 0, I still want the > method to do what I asked, right?
It was a race against time over here, every second counts when you are trying to head off a bug which leaks INFINITY CYCLES. Oh sure, you monday morning quarterbacks can make your air quotes around "correctness" but statistically speaking my decisive action must have saved some very small but finite positive number of people from hitting that loop, and that number * infinity == infinity, so therefore not only was it the right thing to do, it was INFINITELY RIGHT. And now that I have infinite karma you better watch out because I no longer need abide by society's constraints. -- Paul Phillips | Every normal man must be tempted at times Everyman | to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, Empiricist | and begin to slit throats. pp: i haul pills | -- H. L. Mencken -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=.
