I see. Thanks Derek.

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Derek Chen-Becker
<dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Derby has inferior support for binary data types (32k limit) and has a
> couple of other issues that I can't remember off the top of my head.
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:54 PM, jlist9 <jli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Would you care to elaborate in what way Derby is inferior?
>> I understand H2 is probably faster as speed is one of its main
>> design goals. Does Derby have any other issues?
>>
>> Are there any potential issues with using H2 for production?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jack
>>
>> > Derby is inferior in every way to H2 (another open source pure Java
>> > relational database).  If you're building something for production,
>> > Postgresql is your best choice.  If you need a simple database that
>> > needs no
>> > separate process and "just works" H2 is your best choice.
>>
>> --
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Lift" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


Reply via email to