Many of these things are subjective. I'm wondering if maybe we should first agree on *guidelines* as is happening now, and then as we go along systematically through central parts of lift such as net.liftweb.http, holding up names against the guidelines, work out a document of *conventions*--a more specific set of rules, e.g., when or whether to use calc or calculator. This way the conventions are influenced (not dictated though!) by core lift APIs, and then other parts can be held up to that measuring stick and make them conform to consistency.
------------------------------------- Timothy Perrett<[email protected]> wrote: This is such a preference. Most people use IDEs, I personally dont, but I would still choose clarity and marginal verbosity over less typing. A classic is some places in lift we call it "calc" and other palces its "calculator" Cheers, Tim On 14 Dec 2009, at 19:34, David Pollak wrote: > I disagree. When coding with a non-IDE, abbreviations make life much easier. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
