Indeed, if you're building a lot of forms, you quickly realize that Lift currently requires fair amount of code for forms that are not backed by mapper elements. There's space there for better abstrations / DSL improvements to reduce boilerplate -- similar to what David has built for the new wizard.
alex On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, greekscala <hellectro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello lift people, > > lift seems very promising. I am trying to make some tests > and examples because I am new to lift. > I wanted to add some validation to a form element and show > the validation error to the user. > But after little searching I was a little disappointet to see that > there > is no such support, exept when using Mapper. I do not want to use > Mapper. I want only simple field validation with the errors messages > printed in a feedback panel. > > Before lift I was using Wicket. I think they did a good job with the > validators. > > I try to understand why lift has not such support? I do not want to > code > everything in my submit method and validate things there. > > best regards > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
