Indeed, if you're building a lot of forms, you quickly realize that Lift
currently requires fair amount of code for forms that are not backed by
mapper elements.  There's space there for better abstrations / DSL
improvements to reduce boilerplate -- similar to what David has built for
the new wizard.

alex


On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, greekscala <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello lift people,
>
> lift seems very promising. I am trying to make some tests
> and examples because I am new to lift.
> I wanted to add some validation to a form element and show
> the validation error to the user.
> But after little searching I was a little disappointet to see that
> there
> is no such support, exept when using Mapper. I do not want to use
> Mapper.  I want only simple field validation with the errors messages
> printed in a feedback panel.
>
> Before lift I was using Wicket. I think they did a good job with the
> validators.
>
> I try to understand why lift has not such support? I do not want to
> code
> everything in my submit method and validate things there.
>
> best regards
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


Reply via email to