I like the source for the DSL very much, I think it's very well written. Thanks 
for sharing it.

-Ross

On Dec 17, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:

> Okay!
> The following code:
>     val jsFunc: JSFunc = Function("myFunc")("param1", "param2") {case param1 
> :: param2 :: Nil =>
>         Var("someArray") := Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
>         If(param1 < 30) {
>           val x = Var("x")               // now we can use either x or 'x
>           x := (234 - 3) / 2             // calculation happens in scala
>           Var("y") := (2:Expr) * x * 2   // calculation happens in javascript
>           'jsFunc(1, 2, "do it", 'y)
>           val $ = JSIdent("$")
>           $("#myID") >> 'attr("value", "123")
>         } Else {
>           'console >> 'log(">=30")
>         }
>         ForEach(Var("i") In 'someArray) {
>           'console >> 'log("Hi there " & 'i)
>         }
>         Function()("arg1", "arg2") { case arg1 :: arg2 :: Nil =>
>           'alert("Anonymous function (" & arg1 & ", " & arg2 & ")")
>         }(1,2)
>     }
>     println(jsFunc.toCode)
> 
> Produces:
> 
> function myFunc(param1, param2) {
> var someArray
> someArray = [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]
> if((param1 < 30.0)) {
> var x
> x = 115.0
> var y
> y = ((2.0 * x) * 2.0)
> jsFunc(1.0, 2.0, "do it", y)
> ($("#myID")).attr("value", "123")
> } else {
> (console).log(">=30")
> }
> var i
> for(i in someArray) {
> (console).log(("Hi there " + i))
> }
> function (arg1, arg2) {
> alert((((("Anonymous function (" + arg1) + ", ") & arg2) + ")"))
> }(1.0, 2.0)
> }
> 
> It may be desirable that instead of defining your own names for Vars and 
> function parameters, names are auto-generated, since you can anyway use 
> typesafe scala identifiers. This would save boilerplate and produce more 
> "obfuscated" code, and other than the name generating algorithm is a trivial 
> change to make.
> Note that since I am not familiar with Lift's JavaScript APIs I just wrote my 
> own AST, which consists of case classes that contain their data parameters 
> and a toCode method. Feel free to delete them and plug Lift's classes 
> instead--there is no dependency on anything unique about them.
> Also note that to prevent "string" + ident from compiling as a string to be 
> outputted and instead output a + operation, you have two choices: use the & 
> operator instead, which is replaced with + when either operand is a string, 
> or write ("string":Expr) + ident.
> 
> 
> 2009/12/17 Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com>
> Current state attached.
> 
> 
> 2009/12/17 Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com>
> 
> Let me know when you have something.
> 
> Br's,
> Marius
> 
> On Dec 17, 8:58 am, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm thinking of an approach to writing a DSL with a much cleaner syntax. 
> > I'll try to put something together.
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> > Marius Danciu<marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I just want to see if there is any interest in the approach discussed here.
> > As you know Lift has some interesting support for building JavaScript
> > constructs from Scala code usig JsExp, JsCmd etc classes. I used quite a lot
> > this support and it's great but if your JS code that you want to send down
> > to the browser (say as an Ajax or Comet partial update response) gets a bit
> > more complicated then constructing the JS fragment leads IMO to some
> > cumbersome Scala code. I found myselft in quite a few situation to use JsRaw
> > to write the JavaScript fragment in order for the code reader to understand
> > what JavaScript code will be generated. But of course with JsRaw we put
> > everything into a String so I'm not a big fan of this approach. So I started
> > to define a JavaScript like "DSL" that IMO is closer to JavaScript form.
> > Attached is a source code smaple of how this looks like, so for instance we
> > can have something like:
> >
> > val js = JsFunc('myFunc, 'param1, 'param2) {
> >     JsIf('param1 __< 30) {
> >         Var('home) := Wrap(234 __- 3) __/ 2 `;`
> >         Var('someArray) := JsArray(1, 2, 3, 4, 5) `;`
> >         'myFunc(1, 2, "do it", 'home) `;`
> >         $("#myID") >> 'attr("value", "123") `;`
> >       } ~
> >       JsForEach(Var('i) in 'someArray) {
> >         'console >> 'log("Hi there " __+ 'i) `;`
> >       } ~
> >       JsAnonFunc('arg1, 'arg2) {
> >        'alert("Anonymous function " __+ 'arg1 __+ 'arg2)
> >       }(1, 2) `;`
> >     }
> >
> >     println(js.toJs)
> >
> > this yields the following JavaScript code:
> >
> > function myFunc( param1, param2 ) {
> > if (param1 < 30) {
> > var home = ( 234 - 3 ) / 2;
> > var someArray = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ];
> > myFunc(1, 2, "do it", home);
> > $("#myID").attr("value", "123");}
> >
> > for (var i in someArray) {
> > console.log("Hi there " + i);}
> >
> > function ( arg1, arg2 ) {
> > alert("Anonymous function " + arg1 + arg2)
> >
> > }(1, 2);
> > }
> >
> > ... ok I just droped nonsense code in there for exemplification. A few
> > words:
> >
> > 1. JsIf, JsForEach describe JavaScript if and for(each) statements
> > 2. Functions like __<, __>, ... __+, __- are function that alows definition
> > of boolean and/or algebraic expressions.
> > 3. Wrap just wraps an expression into ()
> > 4. Var defined a variable
> > 5 := defines an assignment
> > 6. JsFunc declares a JS function
> > 7. JsAnonFunc declares an anonymous function
> > 8. 'myFunc(1, 2, "do it", 'home)  is simply a javascript function invocation
> > by providing 4 parameter.
> > 9. ~ is just a function that chains statements that don;t necessarily end in
> > ;
> >
> > Do you think that something like this would be usable in Lift?
> >
> > Br's,
> > Marius
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Lift" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
> <DSL.scala>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


Reply via email to