This is correct - many part of lift don't work on GAe... So far, we've
seen little need for it as the vast majority of users simply want more
than GAE can offer.
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Jan 2010, at 22:51, Randinn <[email protected]> wrote:
The problem as far as I know is the GAE sandboxing inhibits most of
what makes lift, lift.
On Jan 14, 8:56 am, __kaveh__ <[email protected]> wrote:
Introduction: I apologize in advanced for I am naive about Scala,
Lift
and elegant design decisions in Lift. I am a C#/ASP.NET/Windows
Application developer. I played with Scala and it was the C# I was
looking for! My job is on .NET platform. But for enjoying something
(and maybe put into real use later) Scala and Lift are really nice
choices (IMHO).
Could there be an official GAE (Google App Engine) version of Lift?
It appears that - for some reason I can not figure out; one of them
for sure is elegance - Lift and Scala are attracting to those who
want
to use GAE/J. This can be a winning/dominated playground for both of
them (even if we put aside concurrency features in GRE) for those who
want to use GRE/J.
Regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
