On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:37 PM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay... the work-around is checked into the Lift repo. > > I say, "Ship RC8 as the beta" and we'll work through this (and likely other) > issues during the beta period. > Sounds good. Thanks! -- Martin
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, martin odersky <martin.oder...@epfl.ch> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak >> <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code.... more in >> > a >> > few minutes. >> > >> If you can make it work, so much the better. To give some info: The >> original ticket had a vararg parameter of the form List[_]* in a case >> class. This caused type inference for the synthetic equals method >> (which uses sameElements for varargs) to fail, because the existential >> in List[_] made the problem underconstrained. The patch passed the >> argument type explicitly as the type parameter. In the lift case, it >> seems that this explicit type parameter violated some type bound, so >> the type inferencer should have chosen a more general type which would >> not violate the bound. The easiest fix is probably to just roll back >> and leave ticket #2867 open until we find a better solution. That's >> what I have done. >> >> Cheers >> >> -- Martin > > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Surf the harmonics >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.