Consider it done good sir.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 6:46 pm, Ross Mellgren <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks! can you throw a ship it on the issue306 RB request for  
> documentation purposes? Also, if you feel like reviewing issue305  
> which it depends on while you're there... ;-)
>
> -Ross
>
> On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:56 AM, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ross,
>
> > I've just got back from Italy... taken a look at your code and it  
> > looks good to me. Go for it :)
>
> > Cheers, Tim
>
> > On 25 Jan 2010, at 19:24, David Pollak wrote:
>
> >> Ross,
>
> >> Thanks for this contribution!!
>
> >> I don't have the bandwidth to review it but would encourage folks  
> >> from the community to take a gander at the code and give you  
> >> feedback.
>
> >> Thanks,
>
> >> David
>
> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Ross Mellgren <[email protected]>  
> >> wrote:
> >> So I've taken the Couch integration I had previously talked about  
> >> and have done quite a bit of work on it:
>
> >> - Now has a record integration:
> >>     - built with two layers -- JSONRecord which is a Record  
> >> implementation that emits/consumes lift-json AST, and CouchRecord  
> >> extends that with database access
> >>     - added Optional versions of every basic record field, to  
> >> represent nullable/optional fields
> >> - Uses box much more extensively, rather than exceptions
> >> - More tests
> >> - Changed the querying from using case class varargs (QueryParam)  
> >> to using methods on a Queryable trait
> >> - Removed use of toJObject and other exception-ful conversions from  
> >> JValue to JObject
> >> - Tests will automatically skip if Couch is not running locally
>
> >> As far as I'm currently aware, the only missing things are:
> >>  - the unit tests don't exercise every type of JSONField, other  
> >> than indirectly via the CouchRecord tests
> >>  - the unit tests don't exercise every one of the Queryable params
>
> >> I'd like to begin the process of getting this into master, so if  
> >> some folks could review it and comment I would be very  
> >> appreciative. In particular, I'd like it if some familiar with  
> >> record could take a gander at the Optional versions I've added and  
> >> vet them. Barring anyone noticing wrong with it, I'll create some  
> >> issues and put the changes up on review board in a couple days.
>
> >> The branch:http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/rmm_wip_couch
> >> lift-couchdb as a diff: 51724dcd09f68c658ffc025ded14fe7d22f888fb
> >> Optional fields in record: 7bb10ac78f83222b2f1f09e986466a0c4edcca64
>
> >> Comments? Suggestions? Scathing rebuttals?
>
> >> -Ross
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> >> Groups "Lift" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> [email protected]
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
> >> .
>
> >> --
> >> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> >> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> >> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> >> Surf the harmonics
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> >> Groups "Lift" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> [email protected]
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
> >> .
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > Groups "Lift" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
> > .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

Reply via email to