On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Lachlan Deck <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/02/2010, at 10:56 AM, David Pollak wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Lachlan Deck <[email protected]> > wrote: > > <....> > > We are not going to do this. We don't expect our users to read release > > notes for subtle stuff like this. We use the Scala type system to signal > > breakage... if there's an API behavior change, the code should cease to > > compile when changing versions. > > Good point. > > Perhaps, as a start, the api behaviour should at least be documented rather > than remaining undefined ? > If you'd like to contribute to the documentation feel free. > @see < > http://scala-tools.org/scaladocs/liftweb/1.0/net/liftweb/mapper/DB$object.html > > > @see < > http://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb-2.0-M1/framework/lift-persistence/lift-mapper/scaladocs/net/liftweb/mapper/DB$object.html#Methods > > > > with regards, > -- > > Lachlan Deck > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
