True. Good solution. On Feb 5, 11:29 am, Aaron Valade <[email protected]> wrote: > Would we even need to prioritize it? If Flot supports both, we should > let it do the hard work of deciding which one to use if they are both > present, which I would imagine would be a very rare case. We can just > mark the old methods as deprecated and then remove them in the future > when Flot doesn't support the old way anymore. > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Peter Robinett <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It requires changing the FlotOptions trait. Actually, we could do > > exactly what Flot 0.6 does and support both (just add the series > > option without removing the lines, points and shadowSize options), > > though then we'd need some way to prioritize one way over the other. > > > Peter > > > On Feb 5, 10:43 am, David Pollak <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Peter Robinett > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> > Hello all, > > >> > Please tell me if you are using the lift-flot module. I am working on > >> > upgrading it to Flot 0.6 and as Aaron noted[1], Flot has switched to a > >> > slightly new format of specifying options. However, they have kept > >> > backwards compatibility, meaning that we could upgrade to the latest > >> > version of Flot without changing the way series options are specified. > >> > Would you prefer to have a breaking change in lift-flot now in order > >> > to ensure future compatibility or would you like to put off this > >> > change until a future version of Flot drops support for this now > >> > depreciated format? > > >> Can you deprecate the Scala calls that correspond to the deprecated Flot > >> calls? If so, that'd be optimal. I'm not sure how widely used Flot is, > >> but > >> unless there are more than 3 people who object to a breaking change, I'd be > >> okay with it. > > >> > Peter > > >> > [1]: > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/a25a93f55... > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> > "Lift" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected] > >> > > > >> > . > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > >> -- > >> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > >> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > >> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > >> Surf the harmonics > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Lift" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
