On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]>wrote:
> Jeppe, > > Certainly 2 has to be the way to go. We can add stuff to the > archetypes to ease this process for users. Moreover, we could add > specific lift modules that carried the right dependencies and boot > wire up to save the users writing boilerplate. i.e.: > > + lift-logging > \ - lift-log4j > \ - lift-logback > > The overhead of this would be negligible. Thoughts? > If we're going to require #2, then I'd like to see some code breakage so that people don't passively upgrade to 2.0-M3 then have their logging magically break. > > Cheers, Tim > > On Feb 6, 11:28 am, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Heiko Seeberger <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > On 5 February 2010 22:11, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> 2) is the cleanest solution since the choice of logging backend is > made > > >> explicit. But this requires people to change their poms in order to > get > > >> any logging. > > > > > Let's go for 2) because in real-world projects people will have to > adjust > > > the POM anyway. E.g. for persistence modules or for 3rd party libs. > > > > After some thoughts, I agree. > > > > One issue remains: Configuration of the actual logging backend (ie log4j > > or logback) to load e.g. prod, test & dev configs. > > > > We can either > > > > 1) Try to be smart and figure out which backend is available and > > configure it automatically. This (I learned :-) doesn't sit too well > > with OSGi and is not really the Lift way. > > > > 2) Require backend specific configuration in Boot. This is the Lift way, > > but it's a breaking change > > > > Opinions? > > > > /Jeppe > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
