I'm starting to look at this. Do you have a repro case?
-Ross
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Something strange is happening in Lift Record now - I have production
> work that for some reason is now not behaving the way it should. The
> custom record implementation that I have relies on knowing the field
> name, and for some reason, it appears to not be being set:
>
> (where Visitor is an example implementation of my Record):
>
> scala> new Visitor().email("dfsfdsf").fields.map(_.name)
> TRACE - Set the value of 'null' with 'dfsfdsf' and marked as dirty.
> (true)
>
> I added some tracing and I see that the "def name" is always null
> now... this is a major problem for me. My field apply method looks
> like:
>
> override def apply(in: FieldValueType): OwnerType = if
> (owner.meta.mutable_?){
> set(in)
> dirty_?(true)
> Log.trace("Set the value of '"+name+"' with '"+in.toString+"' and
> marked as dirty. ("+dirty_?.toString+")")
> owner
> } else {
> owner.meta.createWithMutableField(owner, this, Box.!!(in))
> }
>
> Im really not sure what has broken this, but i've not changed my code
> other than adding the legacy check to accommodate ross' latest
> changes.
>
> I URGENTLY need a fix for this - we have production code relying on
> this.
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
