On Mar 3, 2010, at 11:25 AM, David Pollak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Heiko Seeberger > <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 March 2010 00:03, David Pollak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Heiko Seeberger > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Isn't it possible to put snippets in subpackages of xxx.snippet? > Something like <lift:snippet type="com.acme.snippet.subpackage.SnippetClass">? > > If not, what's the best way to deal with a large number of snippets? > > Explicitly registering the snippet dispatch in LiftRules is the way I'd > recommend doing it. If this is less than 100% optimal for your use case, > let's learn more about your use case and see if we have to expand how > Snippets are looked up. > > Well, registering quite a lot of snippets is indeed less than 100% optimal. > > OK, I have got a not-so-small website with about 100 templates and snippets. > The templates are organized as a tree, e.g. /login/signup/seeker, > /login/signup/offerer, etc. There is not a perfect 1:1 relationship between > templates and snippets, but for sake of simplicity let's assume so. Hence I > would like to organize my snippets in packages according to the templates, > e.g. ...snippet.login.signup.Seeker, ...snippet.login.signup.Offerer, etc. > > One of the things I do with page-specific snippets is call them out in > SiteMap: > > Loc(..., Snippet("foo", snipetFunc)) > > But it might also be interesting to explore a model like Wickets: > > foo/bar/page.html -> look in snippets.foo.bar in addition to the normal > snippets package... would that help?
I have wanted this for a while, I think it would be great. -Ross -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
