Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript parts.
------------------------------------- Marius<marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean to just remove things out of the sudden. But I'll know more once I get to dig deeper. On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can it be changed with a deprecation phase? > > ------------------------------------- > > Marius<marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4 > days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try > to prioritize. > > On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen <mads...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Marius, > > I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects > > under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes > > > Mads > > > On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js > > > abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several > > > redundancies: > > > > 1. JsCmds has ~> method for referencing member of "objects" (i.e > > > elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have >> method that "chains" a > > > JQueryLeft with JQueryRight > > > 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp > > > already have the support for building expressions, composing them, > > > chaining expressions etc. > > > > My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific > > > things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to > > > some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary. > > > > If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my > > > backlog. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Br's, > > > Marius > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Lift" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
