Hi, Please excuse any sense of whining that you get from this - I just want to know if I can configure LT to be as useful as it once was.
1) I badly miss the instarepl and, despite my efforts, I haven't been able to replicate the functionality. Instarepl is available in Nightcode but, the app isn't quite there in terms of multi-tab editing and a few other (minor) features. Sometimes, I'm using LT to launch NC, which points to my frustration. 2) I badly miss code-completion. Why on earth do I fail to even get this feature? It means that, the more I try to explore Clojure software, the more I have to try and remember. Essentially, all the good features that caused LT to raise so much more money that Chris Granger wanted, have been disabled. Is that the case, or can things be made better? I can connect to nrepls that I launch - this helps very little. Auto-complete works on my .behavior files but, not my .clj files - what is that all about - I really need to fix that. I require dependencies but, receive no documentation support in using them. I ask because I am watching this tutorial using Cursive and IntelliJ, and it makes me want to cry, that setup seems so productive to use. Is there any definitive method to get Light Table to be impressive once again? Any configurations that can restore my pride in the LT environment? Even more generally, if people are dumping LT, despite being fans of LT, what alternative should I consider? Thanks, all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Light Table Discussion" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
