Hello all, Christian Decker pointed the following out (source:https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2018-February/000991.html):
>I'd also like to point out that the way we do state invalidations in >Lightning is not really suited for multi-party negotiations beyond 2 >parties. The number of potential reactions to a party cheating grows >exponentially in the number of parties in the contract, which is the >reason the Channel Factories paper relies on the Duplex Micropayment >Channel construction instead of the retaliation construction in LN. Can somebody ellaborate on this assumption? Best, Alejandro.
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
