Good morning Corne, I think onion unpeeling never made it into the BOLT spec precisely due to the problems with it. I think the unpeeling in question is essentially a hop node (rather than the ultimate payer/source) unpeeling the onion in order to find out who was being slow. Perhaps the discussion regarding it is archived elsewhere; I do not know myself.
Regards, ZmnSCPxj Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On May 22, 2018 11:47 PM, Corné Plooy via Lightning-dev <lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > You missed the vital detail: that you must prove channel closure if you > > > > can't unpeel the onion further. That will hit an unresponsive party > > > > with a penalty.[1] > > Is this specified in a BOLT somewhere? I tried to find it several times, > > without success. > > CJP > > Lightning-dev mailing list > > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
