Christian Decker <decker.christ...@gmail.com> writes: > ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev <lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes: >> For myself, I think splice is less priority than AMP. But I prefer an >> AMP which retains proper ZKCP (i.e. receipt of preimage at payer >> implies receipt of payment at payee, to facilitate trustless >> on-to-offchain and off-to-onchain bridges). > > Agreed, multipath routing is a priority, but I think splicing is just as > much a key piece to a better UX, since it allows to ignore differences > between on-chain and off-chain funds, showing just a single balance for > all use-cases.
Agreed, we need both. Multi-channel was a hack because splicing doesn't exist, and I'd rather not ever have to implement multi-channel :) AMP is important, but it's a nasty compromise with the current limitations. I want to have my cake and eat it too, and I'm pretty sure it's possible once the Scnorr-Eltoonicorn arrives. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
