Christian Decker <decker.christ...@gmail.com> writes: > They are orthogonal, I agree, but we should judge their merits > independently, and not batch the discussions out of convenience. > In the case of the htlc_maximum_msat I think it will not be > controversial, but it should get its own proposal and discussion.
BTW, my thinking was that we should add an optional funding tx + merkle proof to channel_announce (or maybe a new channel_announce_with_proof msg). A node would use a feature bit to indicate it wants this. Or we could have a req/response for specific proofs. We could also tunnel bitcoin block headers through the network, which would also help lite nodes. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
