Conner Fromknecht <conner@lightning.engineering> writes: >> For a sequence of `type,len,value`, the `type`s must be in ascending order >> -- not explicitly accepted or rejected. It would be easier to check >> uniqueness > (the previous rule we accepted) here for a naive parser (keep >> track of some "minimum allowed type" that initializes at zero, check current >> type >= this, update to current type + 1) if `type`s are in ascending order. > > Yep ascending makes sense to me, for the reasons you stated.
Definitely a good idea, especially because it results in a canonical serialization format, which is important to ensure signatures over messages can be verified even when reserializing parsed messages. _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
