For the low low cost of 3 witness bytes, I think the simplification of
analysis/separation of concerns is worth it, though I agree it is
probably not strictly required.
On 11/26/18 3:12 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Matt Corallo <lf-li...@mattcorallo.com> writes:
Hmm, are we willing to consider CLTV sufficient? In case you have two
HTLCs, one of medium-small value that has a low CLTV and one of high
value that has a higher CLTV, you could potentially use the soon-CLTV to
delay the commitment transaction somewhat further if you broadcast it
right as the sooner HTLC expires.
I think you haven't got the commitment tx onchain by the time the HTLC
expires, you're already in trouble.
But since there's no script length difference, it *is* simpler to
prepend `1 OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY OP_DROP` to the start of each script.
Cheers,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
