ZmnSCPxj <zmnsc...@protonmail.com> writes:
> But what if 2 of those paths fail?
> It would be better to merge them into a single payment along the expensive 
> 4th path.
> However, the remaining succeeding path has already given `numpaths`=3.
>
> Using `numpaths` overcommits to what you will do in the future, and is 
> unnecessary anyway.
> The payee is interested in the total value, not the details of the split.

Excellent point.

Thanks,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev

Reply via email to