> (I'm seeking a clever way that Bob can assign them and trivially tell
> which ID is assigned to which peer, but I can't figure it out, so I
> guess Bob keeps a mapping and restricts each peer to 256 live scids?).

Hi Rusty.

Here's a potential way for Alice and Bob to agree a set of 256 scids without 
any additional messages or changes to existing messages beyond a feature flag 
and a flag in open_channel, but comes with a computational cost.

Alice and Bob agree on a random integer `r`. This could be negotiated on 
`open_channel`, but we shouldn't need to send additional information because we 
already have a random integer we can use: the `temporary_channel_id`. This is 
not known to anybody besides Alice and Bob.

When a channel is locked, Bob computes n=256 scids, using something 
approximating `concat(n, trunc_bytes(sha256(ec_mult(2^n*r, Q)), 7))`, where `Q` 
is Alice's public key for the channel funding transaction.

The chance of scid collisions between channels is 2^56, which is probably no 
cause for concern.

Instead of keeping a map of 256 scids for each channel, Bob can use a cuckoo 
filter for efficiency. The filter can be used for a quick membership test and 
also as an associative map from scids to channels. It can also support scid 
deletion in the event of channel closure (at the cost of recomputing 256 
ec_mults again).

So when Bob receives a new HTLC to forward, he tests it against his cuckoo 
filter and retreives a candidate set of possible channels to which it may 
refer. For each channel, he takes the most significant byte of the scid as `m` 
and performs `trunc_bytes(sha256(ec_mult(2^m*r, Q)), 7)` and tests the 
least-significant 7 bytes of the result against the scid.

Alice does not need to keep all of the scids she may use for invoices because 
they can be computed on the fly, but she will need to keep a copy of the 
`temporary_channel_id`.

In the reverse direction of Alice forwarding HTLCs to Bob, Bob's public key for 
the funding transaction is used instead.

Regards,
Mark Holden
_______________________________________________
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev

Reply via email to