Joost Jager <joost.ja...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> But Joost pointed out that you need to know the node_id of the next node >> though: this isn't quite true, since if the node_id is wrong the spec >> says you should send an `update_fail_malformed_htlc` with failure code >> invalid_onion_hmac, which node N turns into its own failure message. >> Perhaps it should convert it to `unknown_next_peer` instead? This isn't >> a common error on the modern network; I think our onion implementations >> have been rock solid. >> > > Isn't this what I am suggesting here? > https://twitter.com/joostjgr/status/1385150318959341569
Oops, I didn't read the second part of your tweet properly. Sorry: this was right there indeed. Thanks! Rusty. _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
