Hi guys, happy to see this being discussed again! When I came up with the idea, it was originally intended for cases when there's an inherently trusted exchange, such as trading fiat for sats using an ATM. In this scenario only the push amount was spendable. Receiving more on top of that was disabled.
Since then some implementations have made zero-conf channels fully operational. While strictly worse security, I'm not against it. I'd just really, really like to have these cases distinguished. So I think we need one more bit to signal whether it's only push being zeroconf or the channel is fully zeroconf. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
