On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Joost Jager wrote: > So how would things work out with a combination of both of the > proposals described in this mail? First we make probing free (free as > in no liquidity locked up) and then we'll require senders to pay for > failed payment attempts too. Failed payment attempts after a > successful probe should be extremely rate, so doesn't this fix the ux > issue with upfront fees?
Why couldn't a malicious routing node (or group of colluding routing nodes) succeed the probe and then fail the payment in order to collect the failed payment fee? _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
