Good morning DA,
> Agreed, you cannot rely on a replacement transaction would somehow > invalidate a previous version of it, it has been spoken into the gossip > and exists there in mempools somewhere if it does, there is no guarantee > that anyone has ever heard of the replacement transaction as there is no > consensus about either the previous version of the transaction or its > replacement until one of them is mined and the block accepted. -DA. As I understand from the followup from Peter, the point is not "this should never happen", rather the point is "this should not happen *more often*." Regards, ZmnSCPxj _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
