As long as protocol development and design is done neutrally, I'm all fine!
Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à 10:48, Joost Jager <joost.ja...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Right, that was my above point about fetching scoring data - there's three >> relevant "buckets" of >> nodes, I think - (a) large nodes sending lots of payments, like the >> above, (b) "client nodes" that >> just connect to an LSP or two, (c) nodes that route some but don't send a >> lot of payments (but do >> send *some* payments), and may have lots or not very many channels. >> >> (a) I think we're getting there, and we don't need to add anything extra >> for this use-case beyond >> the network maturing and improving our scoring algorithms. >> (b) I think is trivially solved by downloading the data from a node in >> category (a), presumably the >> LSP(s) in question (see other branch of this thread) >> (c) is trickier, but I think the same solution of just fetching >> semi-trusted data here more than >> sufficies. For most routing nodes that don't send a lot of payments we're >> talking about a very small >> amount of payments, so trusting a third-party for scoring data seems >> reasonable. >> > > I see that in your view all nodes will either be large nodes themselves, > or be downloading scoring data from large nodes. I'd argue that that is > more of a move towards centralisation than the `ha` flag is. The flag at > least allows small nodes to build up their view of the network in an > efficient and independently manner. > > Joost > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev >
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
