Hi Carla + Clara, On 3 Aug 2023, at 19:31, Carla Kirk-Cohen wrote:
> Our ideal collection period would be limited to a 6 month period. One > of our main aims in defining a common data format is to ensure that we > can provide node operators with tooling that they can run locally, so > that they do not need to export the data _at all_, only very aggregated > results. Ah, I didn't realize that only sharing aggregated results would be the 'default' plan, thanks for clarifying this! > > In the case where folks are comfortable sharing their data with us, > we will follow best practices handling this sensitive information and > will not share the data onwards at all. Fields will also be anonymized > as described in the original email. Re your concerns around timestamps, > we can also fuzz timestamps, as only the resolution period matters to > our work (thanks for flagging!). Timestamp fuzzing is great to generally obfuscate when the payments took place, although note that it's of course exactly the resolution time deltas that are the relevant data items w.r.t. timing-based inference. Best, Elias _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
