Maybe the anonymous credentials approach from [2] could use credentials
loaded with sats?

On Mon 28. 8. 2023 at 0:36, René Pickhardt <r.pickha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear fellow Lightning Network developers,
>
> given the congestion problems with channels (aka jamming) that we are
> facing and the various proposals and ideas that are floating around I
> thought I quickly notify you that the TOR project has introduced a dynamic
> proof of work system together with a market based auction system for
> bandwidth via a priority queue to fight DoS attacks [0]. While our problems
> differ I think there are still enough similarities to justify the relevance
> of this mail.
>
> In their technical document [1] they mention that their new patch cannot
> defend against a large botnet and suggest that anonymous credentials [2]
> among other techniques should be investigated.
>
> Personal comment: I am a bit surprised that while they obviously looked at
> Bitcoin they seemed to not have seriously considered to just use Bitcoin
> (for example via Lightning Network paywalls) or a mining protocol directly.
> Instead they argue that the auction based bids are more suitable than a
> static difficulty target as used in bitcoin. However IMHO the dynamic
> properties of their auction mechanism could easily have been achieve by the
> amount of sats being offered instead of a dynamic proof of work solution.
>
> With kind regards Rene Pickhardt
>
>
> [0]
> https://blog.torproject.org/introducing-proof-of-work-defense-for-onion-services/
>
> [1]
> https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/blob/main/proposals/327-pow-over-intro.txt
>
> [2] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-March/014198.html
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev

Reply via email to