Comment #5 on issue 2546 by [email protected]: Prefix incrementers may be preferred for non-primitive types.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2546
Keith O'Hara is not in favor of this patch (see his comments on Rietveld). The code works fine, but in his opinion it is less readable, and the change in performance isinsignificant.
IMO, we don't need to change our code to comply with cppcheck's recommendations. The tool should serverhe project, not the other way around.
