Comment #19 on issue 2397 by [email protected]: Tuplet number incorrectly placed when using additonal articulations and/or abreak
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2397
The problem is a misplaced tuplet number, so the same problem cannot show up without tuplets.
With the example of comment 18, LilyPond gives good output but the same errors as ver2.14 gives, according to comment 15. So the cyclic dependency errors existed since before 26d4079461.
