Comment #16 on issue 3026 by [email protected]: staff-padding should
measure to the alignment-points
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3026
Comment #15
Just to be clear, this seems to be not _at_all_ a regression; we never
found evidence that this worked as advertised.
The code fix is a "5-minute dead-obvious thing", actually, removing a
blunder to make the code do what code comments say was intended. The
broken 'staff-padding implementation is redundant with 'padding and very
rarely has had effect.
My earlier patch was intended to see if people found it useful as an
effective default on TextScripts (which would require followup because so
many special-case markups live in TextScripts) but it seems not to be.
The workaround in the manual Notation Reference 1.3.1 works just as
staff-padding was intended,
\override TextScript.Y-extent = #'(-1.5 . 1.5)
c2^\markup { \huge gorgeous } c^\markup { \huge fantastic }
because extents now have effect only in a few circumstances, one of them
being spacing to the bare staff.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
