Comment #51 on issue 3560 by [email protected]: Completion_heads_engraver with
\scaleDurations
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3560
Actually, there is not much of an agreement on the details of what
constitutes a satisfactorily "smart" decision.
So how about the following: completionFactor is the resulting completion
factor if positive. It is a multiplier for the resulting completion factor
if it is negative. We don't complete if it is zero.
The main behaviors can be achieved by using +1 or -1 here. There is no
mixed or smart behavior. The default in my opinion should be -1 as that is
the only behavior (apart from 0, of course, but why use completion
engravers then?) consistent between split and unsplit notes.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
